top of page

Asia: More Than a Recruitment Market

Writer: Associate Director
Associate Director
Oct 30
2 min read

UK universities would benefit from considering Asia more than just a recruitment market, both today and into tomorrow. It is increasingly a destination in its own right – and a place where international education no longer requires a ‘cross-regional’ overseas move.


Japan recorded 408,069 international students in May 2025, up 21.2% in a year – already exceeding its 400,000 ambition for 2033. South Korea enrolled 253,434 in 2025, including non-degree students, against a 300,000 target for 2027. Malaysia aims for 250,000 by 2030.


China hosted 380,000 international students in 2024–25, including exchange participants, and aims to strengthen its Study in China brand. This October, China’s celebrated Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s new English-taught international civil engineering degree welcomed 36 students from 18 countries. The cohort is small, but the proposition matters: access to a leading Chinese university’s engineering expertise through English.


International provision within China is expanding too. In March 2026, ICEF Monitor reported approximately 800,000 Chinese students in transnational education (TNE). In May this year, China approved 86 joint institutes and 133 joint programmes. This scale of approval is unprecedented. Industry discussion points to an ambition of eight million TNE enrolments in the next decade. One reading is that this expansion is effectively preparation for demographic decline: China’s university-age population is projected to peak in 2032, with research anticipating a sharp fall after 2035.


The logic is long-term sustainability: strengthen provision now to sustain local universities as domestic demand shrinks. Attracting international students offers a strong complementary route. The strategic shift is not simply where students travel. It is where universities create value – and whether that value still depends on students travelling at all.


For UK universities, the response must go beyond strengthening recruitment strategies. Why should students choose UK higher education when international curricula, teaching in English and industry connections are available closer to home? Reputation may secure attention; distinctive academic strengths, credible career outcomes and value for money must justify the choice.


And what of partnership? It should provides students with a distinctive reason to choose what can only be build together, over what either institution can credibly offer alone.


Asia’s rise need not be the UK’s loss, but a strategy built around students travelling west may be no longer enough. UK universities must remain distinctively worth choosing; not only as a destination, but as a pioneering and high-quality partner.


#UniversitiesUK #International #HigherEducation #China

bottom of page